Tax Efficiency Simulation |
To illustrate the tax efficiency of a Corporate Class portfolio, let's compare one here with an equivalent conventional portfolio.
Portfolio A
We'll take the Corporate Class Chorus II Growth Portfolio. After an initial investment of $300,000 at age 55, you invested $500 a month for 10 years.
Portfolio B
This will be a benchmark conventional portfolio. It has the same asset allocation and investment properties as Portfolio A, but it is not a corporate class portfolio.
| Portfolio | ||
|---|---|---|
A Chorus II |
B Benchmark |
|
Value at age 55 |
$300,000 |
$300,000 |
Monthly investment of $500 |
$60,000 |
$60,000 |
Return over 10 years |
$269,107 |
$259,107 |
Income taxes payable on annual distributions |
($15,798) |
($47,291) |
Value at age 65 |
$613,309 |
$572,256 |
Corporate class structure reduces annual taxable distributions and maximizes returns.
Calculation assumptions
Annual return of portfolios A and BLet's continue with our example. At 65, you opt for a portfolio with lower risk from which you draw steady income, calculated to extend capital longevity.
Portfolio A
This time, let's take the Corporate Class Chorus II Balanced Growth Portfolio.
Portfolio B
Once again, the benchmark portfolio matches Portfolio A except that it is not corporate class.
| Portfolio | ||
|---|---|---|
A Chorus II |
B Benchmark |
|
Value at age 65 |
$613,309 |
$572,526 |
Capital gains on deemed sale |
$0 |
$21,047 |
Income taxes payable on this capital gain |
$0 |
($4,736) |
Net amount to transfer at age 65 |
$613,309 |
$567,790 |
Extended capital longevity income (5%) |
$30 665 |
$28,390 |
You start retirement with a larger capital amount that gives you a more comfortable level of income at the same percentage.
Calculation assumptions
Annual return of portfolios A and B
Copyright © 1996-2010, Fédération des caisses Desjardins du Québec. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 1996-2010, Fédération des caisses Desjardins du Québec. All rights reserved.